Well Said!
March 6, 2008 at 10:11 am | In ignition interlock | Leave a CommentDaily, I receive news items about the progress of ignition interlock legislation through various state’s legislative processes. I am thrilled to see that our lawmakers nationwide are making use of technology to increase public safety on the roads. This particular editorial from West Virginia is very well written and to the point.
Of note:
Like so many issues, public opinion is ahead of our policies. Sixty-five percent of the public supports requiring the installation of interlocks in the vehicles of all convicted drunken drivers. Even 82 percent of offenders believe interlocks are effective and fair. It’s time to make it law in every state, including West Virginia. (We can substitute “Alaska”!)
House Bill 19, Alaska’s own piece of legislation dealing with greatly expanding the use of ignition interlocks is awaiting scheduling to be heard in the Senate Finance Committee as of this writing. Perhaps next week…
Public opinion favors the additional sanction as a safety measure. MADD endorses the use of the technology for ALL offenders to save lives. The program is funded by the offenders themselves. All reasons to see this through THIS session!
Scroll down for more specific information on this topic.
Ignition Locks Reduce DWIs
February 11, 2008 at 10:16 am | In ignition interlock | Leave a CommentA recently published study in the current issue of the journal Traffic Injury Prevention finds that requiring interlocks for first time DUI offenders reduces their recidivism rates by 60%. According to the author, Paul Marques, Phd.,
“The idea that there should be any important difference between the risk posed by a first offender and a repeat offender is unsupported. The average first offender has driven drunk many times before he or she was arrested. The big risk difference is between non-offenders and first offenders. The risk difference between first offenders and repeat offenders is small by comparison.”
You can find a summary of the study here. The article looks at first time offender data, economic benefits to society of interlocks as well as addressing the personal productivity of offenders.
According to the article,
“The authors also found an economic benefit to vehicle interlocks. One device costs the offender $2.25 per day, a small price for the public compared to the damage and destruction caused by DWI crashes. The study estimated that for every dollar spent on interlocks for first offenders, the public saves $3. “
“For so many years we’ve managed DWIs as criminals, but this is more then just a crime issue since many DWI offenders are alcohol dependent. Interlocks present an opportunity to help change behavior rather than simply punishing or incarcerating the offender,” Marques says. “It’s not enough to revoke a license – 75 percent of all people with revoked licenses drive anyway – but you don’t want to sentence an entire family to poverty if they’re dependent on that driver getting to and from his or her job. By installing an interlock, the risk that the DWI offender poses is controlled, and interlocks become a public benefit.”
The body of research continues to build substantiating the value of ignition interlocks.
HB 19 Progress Update and a couple of more thoughts. . .
February 10, 2008 at 1:32 pm | In DUI, Research Links, drink driving, drunk driving, ignition interlock, recidivism | Leave a CommentI called Senator Stedman’s office last week because he, as Co-Chair of the Senate Finance Committee, is in charge of scheduling bills to be heard. I was assured there was a plan to schedule HB 19 about ignition interlocks, but that it would be later in the session. I will continue to make calls to encourage the hearing of the bill as well as to stimulate serious discussion regarding strengthening the bill this session.
Toward that end of discussing the merits of any changes to the bill, here is another look at an ignition interlock program being conducted elsewhere. A number of Canadian provinces are using ignition interlocks to reduce drunk driving recidivism and improve highway safety. The program in Saskatchewan, to which this article refers, interestingly includes multiple offenders, those convicted of refusing a chemical test and a performance-based exit from the program.
A fairly comprehensive list of ignition interlock programs in use worldwide can be found here. In reviewing theprograms, these are the questions I ask relative to HB 19:
1. WHO is included in the provision to use an ignition interlock?
2. At what point, post conviction, is the interlock required?
3. What determines release from the program — performance or a pre-determined time period?
4. How has the program affected DUI recidivism in the area in which it is being used?
Perhaps, sometime soon, I’ll be able to take a closer look at these questions and post some of my findings. In the meantime, I’d encourage Alaskans to move in the direction we already know to be effective – expand the use of ignition interlocks, include as many DUI offenders as possible as soon as possible and require a performance-based exit from the program!
Other States are Considering Ignition Interlock Bills
January 30, 2008 at 12:03 pm | In DUI, DUI legislation, drunk driving | 2 CommentsTags: ignition interlock, state legislation
Momentum is building for the use of ignition interlocks nationwide. A question from every astute legislator is always, “What is the rest of the country doing in regard to this issue?” Below is a summary addressing proposed legislation that has been published during the past week! To date, the Alaska Senate Finance Committee has not scheduled HB 19 for a hearing. I’m sure it will be – we can’t let Alaska fall behind on this issue, in spite of our 90-day Session!
The states of Washington and Missouri have both introduced bills before their legislature this year regarding the creation of special ignition interlock drivers’ licenses for DUI offenders. New Mexico legislature is considering tweaking their already well-developed ignition interlock law by increasing sanctions for tampering with the device. Wisconsin, a state known for less severe DUI sanctions, is considering for the first time, an ignition interlock requirement for DUI offenders versus the optional sanction in place currently. Hawaii, a state with no ignition interlock law at all, has introduced its very first bill this session.
APRN Looks at Drink Driving in Fairbanks
January 4, 2008 at 12:56 pm | In ignition interlock | 1 CommentTags: Alaska drunk driving, APRN, Fairbanks drunk driving, HB 19, ignition interlock
While Mothers Against Drunk Driving reported that Alaska had the lowest rate of alcohol related traffic deaths in 2006 of all the states, the statisitcs for Fairbanks are not encouraging. Alaska Public Radio examined the particular situation in their story, “Fairbanks Struggles to Keep Drunk Drivers off the Road”. You can listen to the story at the link.
My thoughts are that, once again, it is being clearly demonstrated that Alaska has maxed out the deterrent value of current sanctions and to continue the upward trajectory of increasing highway safety, we must creatively employ other strategies. Alcohol abuse is a complicated social problem and the ignition interlock via HB19 is only one piece in the puzzle to solve it. But is a piece.
The legislative session begins soon. Let’s be sure this piece doesn’t get lost under the metaphorical table and encourage our legislators put it in its proper place!
What’s happening in Europe. . .
December 26, 2007 at 6:16 pm | In ignition interlock | Leave a CommentTags: European alcolocks, ignition interlock, personal use breathalyzer
A quick review of the news worldwide led me to this article published 14 December 2007: “Motor Transport tests Volvo Alcolock”
It begins: “Volvo is adding Alcolock to its United Kingdom options list, and is confident that this anti drink-driving device has the potential to save lives. While the majority of truck drivers have a responsible attitude to drink driving, how many are blissfully unaware that the booze they consumed last night may still be in their system the next morning? These are the people that Alcolock is primarily aimed at. The option is wired into the truck’s ignition system, and requires the driver to blow into it before starting the engine. Should a dangerous alcohol level be detected, the truck will fail to start.” To read the rest of the article, click here.
Interesting that Europeans have embraced the interlock (known as alcolocks there) not only as a punitive measure but as a preventative measure as well. Personal use alcolocks are being used more widely in Europe as this article chronicles.
NPR is Talking About Ignition Interlocks
December 10, 2007 at 4:33 pm | In ignition interlock | Leave a CommentTags: drunk driving insurance npr Justice Talking
On their program, “Justice Talking“, National Public Radio broadcast a show addressing whether or not drunk driving laws are too punitive. I.e. Are the sanctions really improving highway safety and saving lives? There is an excellent discussion with a representative from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety as well as another look at the New Mexico law making IIDs a requirement for first time drunk driving offenders.
Second Newsletter posted!
December 3, 2007 at 1:17 pm | In ignition interlock | Leave a CommentCheck out Issue 2 of the Ignition Interlock Informer on the newsletter page.
The New Mexico Model
December 3, 2007 at 12:42 pm | In Alaska legislation, DUI legislation, Research Links, drunk driving, ignition interlock, recidivism | Leave a Comment
Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) has touted New Mexico’s ignition interlock program as one of the country’s best.
So, what is the the New Mexico Model? Click for a powerpoint presentation. Most fundamentally, ignition interlocks are mandatory for ALL DWI offenders, even first-time offenders and ALL offenders are eligible to drive with an Ignition Interlock License after a 30 day hard revocation. (This includes misdemeanors, felons, and those convicted of DWI, Refusal or Driving with License REvoked or Suspended due to a DWI conviction.) Continue reading The New Mexico Model…
IID Recommendations from the Netherlands
December 1, 2007 at 1:49 pm | In Research Links, alcolock, drink driving, drunk driving, ignition interlock | Leave a CommentI just found this Alcolock paper from the Institute of Road Safety, Netherlands.
Alcolock is the European term for an ignition interlock. This paper is an excellent review of how alcolocks are used in Europe and provides recommendations for the implementation of an excellent program in the Netherlands. To be learned, this is a must-read.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
